|
A Pentagon inspector general’s report that had exonerated the Pentagon’s retired military analyst program has been formally withdrawn by the Pentagon Inspector General. Since its release at the end of the Bush administration, the IG report, which some members of Congress labeled a “whitewash,” has been held up by former officers and officials involved in the scandal as evidence that the Times’ reporting was flawed.

When reached again by columnist Bedard after the Pentagon IG report was withdrawn, Urbahn responded: "Since the New York Times got a Pulitzer for its discredited reporting, perhaps the administration deserves Olympic gold for its latest backflip. Typical for the Obama administration, this is a 'change' we can't believe in." Smith told Bedard that he did not want to speak to the media further about this subject.
Steve Capus, the president of NBC News, a network which hired Barry McCaffrey as well as other ex-generals for on-the-air analysis and did not reveal their conflicts of interest outlined in the New York Times story, wrote in a letter to Clark Hoyt, the public editor of the New York Times, that the IG report ''undercuts the premise'' the New York Times story.
David Barstow

General McCaffrey, a central figure in the Pentagon scandal who remains an active NBC news consultant, used the now discredited IG report to defend his conflicts of interest outlined in the Barstow story. McCaffrey and other former officers were found to have praised or endorsed contractors’ equipment during their appearances without revealing they were on the payroll of the companies that sold the Pentagon the equipment. NBC news defended McCaffrey by saying as a consultant he was not subject to the same ethics standards as their regular news employees.
The IG report “does dispute Barstow’s entire story,” McCaffrey declared in a press release shortly after the Pentagon IG report was released last January.
Meanwhile, with the exception of The Daily Show and The Rachel Maddow Show, the television network blackout of this story continues. The non-profit National Security News Service gave Barstow the original idea to undertake the story. The effort from idea to print took almost three years as the Pentagon forced the New York Times to fight for every document related to the scandal. After Barstow's first story ran in April 2008, the Pentagon placed additional information on their website that they had not previously provided to Barstow.
NSNS Editor Joseph Trento said, "The Bush Pentagon flooded the media with the same documents Barstow had fought for in the hopes that competing media would weaken the effect of Barstow’s November 2008 follow up by trying to make it non-exclusive. That effort failed."
Trento added, "This entire episode has been a huge embarrassment to the network news divisions who failed the American public by helping the Bush Administration sell their war policy in the most dishonest way possible. Congress needs to examine the entire Pentagon propaganda machine and drag in under oath the network news executives who went along with this travesty.”
Latest articles from DC Bureau Administrator
- Photo Credits: Fish and Paint Chips posted on Friday, 25 September 2009
- Donate Now posted on Friday, 31 July 2009
- Staff posted on Sunday, 12 July 2009
| Under Siege in Kurdistan, Can the Talabanis Keep Their Influence In Washington?< Prev | Next >NBC News: Where PR triumphs over the Truth |
|---|



